Sahara Fragile

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Sahara desert
  • Namib desert
  • Kalahari desert
  • Savanna desert
  • Fragile States

Sahara Fragile

Header Banner

Sahara Fragile

  • Home
  • Sahara desert
  • Namib desert
  • Kalahari desert
  • Savanna desert
  • Fragile States
Fragile States
Home›Fragile States›Ballot initiatives allow the people to avoid right-wing politicians in this election, so the right wants to abolish them

Ballot initiatives allow the people to avoid right-wing politicians in this election, so the right wants to abolish them

By Christopher J. Jones
November 14, 2022
0
0

By Sarah Anderson | –

( Otherwords.org) – This fall, in the run-up to the midterm elections, a group of Catholic nuns, Protestant ministers and other religious leaders caravanned in South Dakota for what they called a “Love Your Neighbour”.

Citizens’ initiatives achieved great successes at mid-term. But now this form of direct democracy is under attack.

They stopped at grocery stores, restaurants, senior centers, libraries and other community gathering places to start conversations about health insurance. They heard story after story of family members, friends and neighbors struggling to afford quality health care.

The purpose of this tour: to build support for a ballot initiative to help more South Dakotans get the care they need.

Through such initiatives, citizens can circumvent elected officials who have become disconnected from their constituents.

In this year’s elections, voters over 30 states engaged in this form of direct democracy. These voters enshrined abortion rights in states like Michigan, funded universal preschool and child care in New Mexico, and clamped down on medical debt in Arizona.

In South Dakota, the “Love Your Neighbor” campaign won big. By a margin of 56 to 44, voters approved a proposal to force their state government to expand Medicaid eligibility, a move that will help about 42,500 working-class people get treatment.

These people earn too much to qualify for the state’s existing Medicaid program, but too little to access private insurance through the Affordable Care Act. Since 2010, the federal government has covered 90% of the costs when states expand Medicaid, but political leaders in South Dakota and 11 other states declined to do so.

This isn’t the first time South Dakotans have used effective strategies of people-to-people organizing and ballot initiatives for the good of their neighbors.

In 2016, a bipartisan coalition with strong support from the faith community won an incredible victory against financial predators, winning 76% support for a ballot impose a 36% interest rate cap on payday loans. Previously, those rates averaged around 600% in South Dakota, trapping many low-income families in a downward spiral of debt.

In this midterm election season, Nebraska offers another inspiring example of citizen action to circumvent out-of-touch politicians.

For 13 years now, Republicans in Congress have blocked efforts to raise the federal minimum wage, leaving it stuck at $7.25 since 2009. Nebraska’s entire congressional delegation — all Republicans — has always opposed the hikes minimum wage. Rep. Adrian Smith, for example, recently attacked President Biden’s $15 federal minimum proposal as “economically harmful.”

Nebraskans see the issue differently.

Voters there approved an increase in the state minimum wage to the same level Biden has proposed — $15 an hour — by 2026. The measure, which sailed with 58% supportwill mean larger paychecks for approximately 150,000 Nebraskans.

Election measures like these can send a healthy wake-up call to political leaders who aren’t listening to their constituents. But some special interests, especially those with deep pockets and driven by narrow profit motives, don’t necessarily want ordinary Americans to be heard.

State legislatures across the country have seen a slew of bills aimed at restricting or eliminating the ballot measurement process. According to Ballot Initiative Strategy Centerthe number of such bills has increased by 500% between 2017 and 2021. Dozens more have been introduced in 2022, including efforts to raise the threshold to pass a ballot measure beyond a vote at simple majority.

The purpose of these restrictions? To undermine the will of the people.

At a time when more and more Americans are worried about the future of our democracy, we should applaud the advocates in South Dakota, Nebraska and elsewhere who engage their fellow citizens in the political decisions that affect their lives. .

We need more democracy. Not less.

Sarah Anderson directs the Global Economy Project and co-edits Inequality.org at the Institute for Policy Studies.

Otherwords.org

Related posts:

  1. Hair transplant Turkey – ABC Money
  2. Corsair did their best, but I still don’t like opto-mechanical keyboards
  3. Payday Loans May Help You with Emergency Cash Requirements
  4. Amazon – Best-selling Amazon products in 2020 | Zoom Fintech

CATEGORIES

  • Fragile States
  • Kalahari desert
  • Namib desert
  • Sahara desert
  • Savanna desert

RECENT POSTS

  • In South Dakota and Nebraska Deep Red, voters used ballot initiatives to reduce inequality
  • Innovative solution for financial ills
  • “We were abandoned in the desert at 2 a.m.”: migrants expelled from Algeria to Niger
  • ILoveBoobies participates in Desert Dash
  • Land Bank Self-sufficiency is a mirage in the desert | News, Sports, Jobs

ARCHIVES

  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • November 2012
  • May 2012
  • October 2011
  • November 2010
  • April 2008
  • July 2006
  • November 2005
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions