Sahara Fragile

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Sahara desert
  • Namib desert
  • Kalahari desert
  • Savanna desert
  • Fragile States

Sahara Fragile

Header Banner

Sahara Fragile

  • Home
  • Sahara desert
  • Namib desert
  • Kalahari desert
  • Savanna desert
  • Fragile States
Sahara desert
Home›Sahara desert›World Bank investments in the Great Green Wall: a desert mirage?

World Bank investments in the Great Green Wall: a desert mirage?

By Christopher J. Jones
March 23, 2021
0
0


At the One Planet Biodiversity Summit on January 11, World Bank President David Malpass announced a major new World Bank Group funding commitment in the Sahelian arid zones of Africa, which border the southern border. Sahara Desert, for a total of $ 5 billion over the next five years.

As the Bank’s press release notes, the investments will ostensibly be used to “help restore degraded landscapes, improve agricultural productivity and promote livelihoods in 11 African countries on a strip of land stretching from Senegal. in Djibouti ”.

The investments are integrated into a larger initiative – the Great Green Wall of the Sahel, which was first announced in 2007. The Bank’s new commitment was part of the $ 14 billion pledged at the Great Wall initiative. Green at the One Planet Summit in January by France and other donors.

Too often decisions are made on a map in a remote office about an area deemed empty and conducive to regreeningIan Scoones, Institute of Development Studies, and Camilla Toulmin, International Institute of Environment and Development

As noted in a January blog post by Ian Scoones of the UK-based Institute of Development Studies and Camilla Toulmin of the International Institute for Environment and Development, the initiative is certainly on a “grandiose” scale. : “Extending over 8,000 km and 100 million hectares,… the advance of the Sahara deserts must be repelled by the planting of trees and the greening of the landscapes of the Sahelian region. … Visible from space and pronounced like a natural wonder, the symbolism of a wall reversing environmental degradation, quelling insurgency and conflict and stemming the flow of migrants is dramatic.

However, important questions remain about the underlying development logic of the initiative, which have been echoed by the findings of the Bank’s own Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) in its evaluations of the Bank’s existing investments in the past. Sahel.

The Great Green Wall: a continuation of (bad) colonial interpretations

As Scoones and Toulmin point out, scientific theories regarding the expansion of the Sahara to the south first arose in European colonial times – and then turned out to be wrong. They note: “In 1934, the colonial scientist… EP Stebbing first claimed that the Sahara was expanding year after year. This was based on a flawed analysis, but at the time it fueled the doomsday idea of ​​environmental degradation… Huge efforts have been made in top-down soil conservation measures as well as in regulating soil conditions. agricultural and livestock populations.

The narrative of desertification extending south into the Sahel has persisted, often providing the rationale for foreign-funded interventions. However, as Scoones and Toulmin point out, an emerging body of evidence shows that the Sahel defies such simplistic explanations: “Dryland degradation emerges through a complex interplay of processes and does not extend in one direction. Satellite imagery and archaeological evidence from these arid regions show wet and dry spells, with greening and drying up of landscapes occurring in phases over time. These are highly variable environments, where attempts at stability and control are unsuccessful, and where livelihoods are best served by diversification, risk allocation and mobility. “

IEG analysis raises critical questions

A January blog from IEG provided an overview of its assessments of the Bank’s involvement in the Great Green Wall to date, through the Sahel and West Africa Program in support of the the Great Green Wall (SAWAP). While this is not an assessment of all projects funded by the World Bank under SAWAP, IEG presented the sample as indicative of some of the lessons learned from the initiative so far. here.

While the IEG has declared that SAWAP has been a “technical success”, apparently increasing the vegetation cover and resulting in the rehabilitation of land in the project sites, this comes with the caveat that, “a precise understanding of the change of vegetation cover across the Sahel, attributable to donor investments in the Great Green Wall, has been limited due to underinvestment in measurement (e.g., a standardized vegetative difference index to measure vegetation change , recommended as part of a regional World Bank project at the start of SAWAP, was never implemented.) And, more importantly, none of the World Bank projects estimated the effect of the modification of precipitation regimes on the greening effects. “

The IEG also highlighted other issues related to the SAWAP projects funded by the World Bank. These include “the use of zonal enclosures – a land management practice that seeks to restore degraded land by preventing livestock and humans from freely accessing it in the short to medium term -” [which] risks exacerbating the vulnerability ”of those who depend on communal land.

The blog added that in some cases the projects exacerbate localized inequalities: “Raising the value of degraded land, as has been done by the Great Green Wall initiative, changes the decision-making calculation of land users – with Increased agricultural value, this land can fall prey to elites, and can lead to encroachment by non-traditional farmers who risk dislocating the local population. He continued, “Because land restoration primarily benefits those who have access to land, some women and youth are particularly disadvantaged in the Sahel.”

Green the Sahel from below?

IEG assessments show the potential pitfalls of the Great Green Wall initiative – including the danger that fixation with expensive funding commitments and tree planting targets could override delicately balanced local practices. of land use in the Sahel undertaken by farmers, pastoralists, and others.

As Scoones and Toulmin have pointed out, “climate change can become a catch-all explanation for governance failures, while in the Sahel, security and counterterrorism programs can be linked to development. … Too often, decisions are made on a map in a remote office in an area deemed empty and conducive to regreening.

They conclude: “The focus on regenerating landscapes and promoting livelihoods through a sensitive and local approach to sustainable development is the way forward and will likely cost less than $ 14 billion.

In an editorial for Thomson Reuters Foundation on March 3, Wanjira Mathai and Salima Mahamoudou of the World Resources Institute echoed this sentiment, saying that “the magic that can restore Africa’s degraded farms, forests and pastures lies in the millions of local champions across the country. the continent, especially young people and women. “


Related posts:

  1. Rochdale News | News headlines | Rochdale skin therapist to travel Sahara desert to raise funds for skin disease research
  2. Crossing the Algerian desert: “We were 15 at the start and only two at the finish”
  3. ‘Star Wars’ fan once searched the Sahara Desert for priceless collectibles
  4. Corkman raises money for charity by trekking 260 km through the Sahara Desert
Tagsclimate changesahara desert

CATEGORIES

  • Fragile States
  • Kalahari desert
  • Namib desert
  • Sahara desert
  • Savanna desert

RECENT POSTS

  • What is normally included in a desert safari?
  • Earnings Access Provider ZayZoon Raises $25.5M to Bring Financial Flexibility and… | Your money
  • Warmer Kalahari Desert Could Stop Hornbill Breeding Within Years
  • Clues to Loch Ness Monster found in desert
  • Chinese digital loan sharks spread their wings in India: report

ARCHIVES

  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • November 2012
  • May 2012
  • October 2011
  • November 2010
  • April 2008
  • July 2006
  • November 2005
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions